The truth about Lana del Rey and Ariana Grande’s relationship

We know that Lana Del Rey attracts other creative types. She’s had a long-term friendship with James Franco and has collaborated with several musicians over her prolific career. One collab that totally caught our attention was the union of Ariana Grande, Miley Cyrus and Lana Del Rey for the song “Don’t Call Me Angel” for Charlie’s Angels.

Since their artistic connection, it seemed like Del Rey could not stop singing Grande’s praises. In an interview with 104.3 MYfm in August 2019, Del Rey got asked about confidence and said, “Like Ariana. She’s very confident.”

In addition, Del Rey did an interview with The New York Times and praised Grande again while speaking about the Charlie’s Angels song: “First of all, I really, really like Ariana. I had been listening to ‘Dangerous Woman’ a lot. I got her number at some point and we would chat. And then ‘Thank U, Next’ came out and I freaking loved that record. Every song, I was like, how did she write that? So when she asked me to do the ‘Charlie’s Angels’ feature, I was like, ‘All right, if you really want me to!'”

She later added, “[T]hen Ariana’s choices of intonation, it might not be traditional, but it’s very good.”

While things looked solid between the two musicians, something has happened recently that might signify a feud between them. Keep reading to find out.

Lana Del Rey unfollows Ariana Grande

There was a trail of evidence that Lana Del Rey and Ariana Grande respected each other as musicians. Grande asked Del Rey to collaborate on the Charlie’s Angels song. Meanwhile, when Del Rey visited the BBC Radio 1 Live Lounge, she performed Grande’s song, “Break Up With Your Girlfriend, I’m Bored.”

But trouble started brewing because of the recent posts Del Rey has shared on social media where she criticized other female musicians, including Grande, saying that they use sexuality in their music and wear “no clothes.”

Well, because of this, things might not be so great now between Del Rey and Grande. In a later post, Del Rey seemed to imply that Grande reached out to her, by saying: “Despite the feedback that I’ve heard from several people that I mentioned in a complementary way, whether it be Ariana or Doja Cat….” This totally sounds like Grande spoke with Del Rey.

As further evidence of a feud, Pop Crave pointed out on May 22, 2020 that Del Rey unfollowed Grande on Instagram shortly after that post. This doesn’t bode well. Hopefully they can work out the disagreement because we loved their collabs and the way they continually supported each other! 

Source: Read Full Article

The Classic Rock Band John Lennon Called 'Bullsh*t'

John Lennon wasn’t just a musician. Both during and after John’s time with the Beatles, he was also an amateur music critic. If he didn’t like a band or singer, he made that known.

Sometimes, John’s taste in music could be contrarian. He occasionally had criticisms for bands that were generally acclaimed. He once called a classic rock band “bullsh*t.”

What John Lennon thought of early 1970s pop music

In a 1971 Rolling Stone interview, Jann S. Wenner asked John about the current state of rock music. John admitted he wasn’t very familiar with current rock music. Then Wenner asked John if he liked anything in the current Top 10.

John said he didn’t regularly listen to the Top 10 but found current music to be quite stagnant. “Only when I’m recording or about to bring something out will I listen [to the Top 10]. Just before I record, I go buy a few albums to see what people are doing. Whether they have improved any, or whether anything happened. And nothing’s really happened. There’s a lot of great guitarists and musicians around, but nothing’s happening, you know.”

The band John Lennon called ‘bullsh*t’

RELATED: John Lennon: Two ‘Fruity’ Folk Singers He Refused to Listen To

John apparently wasn’t too interested in current hits. However, he did single one band out for criticism: the jazz-rock band Blood, Sweat & Tears. This is a bit surprising, as Blood, Sweat & Tears were a critically acclaimed band.

John said “I don’t like the Blood, Sweat & Tears sh*t. I think all that is bullsh*t. Rock ‘n’ roll is going like jazz, as far as I can see, and the bullsh*tters are going off into that excellentness which I never believed in and others going off … I consider myself in the avant-garde of rock ‘n’ roll. Because I’m with Yoko and she taught me a lot and I taught her a lot, and I think on her album you can hear it, if I can get away from her album for a moment.”

How Blood, Sweat & Tears crossed paths with the Beatles

RELATED: John Lennon: The Life He Would Have Traded for His Time in the Beatles

John didn’t like Blood, Sweat & Tears. Well, what did Blood, Sweat & Tears think of the Beatles? In an interview with Rolling Stone, the band’s founder, Al Kooper, listed a number of influences, including the Beatles. In the same article, Wenner compared Blood, Sweat & Tears’ horn section to the horn section on the Beatles’ “Got to Get You Into My Life” — a song the band would later cover. It’s interesting how John was so opposed to a band that took inspiration from the Fab Four.

Interestingly, Blood, Sweat & Tears crossed paths with the Beatles in an indirect way before John discussed the former band with Wenner. The New York Times reports that Blood, Sweat & Tears’ self-titled album beat Abbey Road for the Grammy Award for Album of the Year. It’s unknown if the band’s win factored into John’s assessment of them. Regardless of who won the Grammy that year, Abbey Road is still a legendary album.

Also see: John Lennon: Why Folk Icon Joan Baez Refused to Sleep With Him

Source: Read Full Article

Some Fans Think the Kardashian-Jenners 'Would Not Survive Without Social Media'

Would the Kardashian-Jenners be where they are today if it wasn’t for social media? In a fan debate about whether or not the family is respected by their Hollywood peers, a side discussion about their social media presence raised some interesting points about how they’ve elevated their celebrity status.

Are the Kardashian-Jenners respected by other celebrities?

Sure, they’re famous, but do the Kardashian-Jenner family have the respect of their fellow celebrities? That was the interesting question posed by one fan on Reddit, who believes that other celebs don’t respect them because “their worst offense is flaunting their wealth.” The Reddit user pointed out that other famous people don’t do that, calling the way the Kardashian-Jenners show off designer bags, cars, and houses “SO tacky.”

“It’s like they’re all insecure that they don’t have any true discernible talent so they make up for it by trying to appear to be cooler and more successful than they actually are,” they noted.

An interesting side note the Redditor shared was the beliefthat without social media, the Kardashian-Jenners might not have the same levelof fame.

“I think the KarJenners would not survive without social media, especially Kylie,” they wrote. “All her friends are social media clout chasers and that actually makes me feel bad for her. I think she’s the least respected after Khloe. I think their popularity is all an illusion, and KJ [Kris Jenner] makes deals with gossip sites, businesses, etc. to constantly publish things about them.”

View this post on Instagram

Make up today by @kyliejenner

A post shared by Kim Kardashian West (@kimkardashian) on

RELATED: Which Kardashian-Jenner Sister Has The Most Instagram Followers?

Could the KarJenners have their level of success withoutsocial media?

The way the KarJenners use social media as a way to cultivate their brands is fascinating — in addition to sponsored posts, they promote their own business ventures and cross-promote other family members’ products. Their huge following as social media influencers means that there are a lot of eyes on the products and projects they’re selling.

One Reddit user pointed out that for a more traditional celebrity, “they don’t really need to chase clout because they have their own big fan bases, and they don’t get their work from rubbing shoulders with influencers, but from performing well in sales of albums, performances, etc.”

“Maybe younger generations of stars would care, who still need the eyeballs that big social media influencers command (esp in music) but otherwise, what do the Kardashians have to offer them? To me, social media fame is a different world from artistic fame, and I think Kanye embodies that in comparison to them,” they explained.

They have ruled social media

A Digital Marketing Institute article titled “The Kardashian’s Guide to Smashing Social Media: What’s the Secret?,” highlighted the Kardashian-Jenners’ Instagram success, with the author sharing how the behind-the-scenes access to their lives is “like Keeping Up With the Kardashians but in an unscripted, unedited, and intimate format.”

“Through their social media channels, the sisters are able to build and direct their own constant narrative,” the writer notes. “Personal connections are powerful. In business, this principle nurtures customer-brand relationships, encourages loyalty, and drives sales.”

They add, “In short; it’s a clear route to success. Bymaking themselves ‘accessible,’ the Kardashians have built a prospectivecustomer base that’s hundreds of millions strong.”

Source: Read Full Article

Bindi Irwin Takes Aim at the Paparazzi for Causing Turmoil on Her Wedding Day

Reality star and conservationist Bindi Irwin wed longtime beau Chandler Powell at the Australian Zoo in March. Having to drastically alter their wedding plans due to the coronavirus crisis, the young couple chose forge ahead with tying the knot rather than putting their nuptials on hold.

While the two were able to celebrate their union, Irwin recently revealed that there were other factors outside of the pandemic that affected their special day.

An earlier wedding day for Bindi Irwin and Chandler Powell

While the couple had originally planned to wed on April 4, they moved the date up to March 25 when quarantine restrictions were implemented. Realizing they could not have the large wedding celebration they had been putting together, Irwin and Powell decided to head down the aisle earlier and focus on their vows.

“We held a small ceremony and I married my best friend. There are no words to describe the amount of love and light in my heart right now,” she captioned the photo on Instagram, noting the lack of guests was due to social distancing. “We’ve planned this beautiful day for nearly a year and had to change everything, as we didn’t have guests at our wedding. This was a very difficult decision but important to keep everyone safe.”

The bride had her closest family members – her mom Terri and brother Robert – by her side. The couple paid tribute to Irwin’s late father Steve in the ceremony.

View this post on Instagram

March 25th 2020 ❤️ We held a small ceremony and I married my best friend. There are no words to describe the amount of love and light in my heart right now. We’ve planned this beautiful day for nearly a year and had to change everything, as we didn’t have guests at our wedding. This was a very difficult decision but important to keep everyone safe. We wish all of our friends and family could have been there with us, however it’s lovely that we will be able to share photos and videos. Right now we’re encouraging the world to hold onto hope and love, which will carry us forward during this profound time in history. Today we celebrated life and revelled in every beautiful moment we shared together in our Australia Zoo gardens. Mum helped me get ready, Robert walked me down the aisle, Chandler became my husband and together we lit a candle in Dad’s memory. We shared tears and smiles and love. Thankfully, since we all live at Australia Zoo as a family, we could be there for each other. To everyone reading this – stay safe, social distance and remember LOVE WINS!

A post shared by Bindi Irwin (@bindisueirwin) on

“Mum helped me get ready, Robert walked me down the aisle, Chandler became my husband and together we lit a candle in Dad’s memory,” she wrote. “We shared tears and smiles and love. Thankfully, since we all live at Australia Zoo as a family, we could be there for each other.”

RELATED: Bindi Irwin Shares Why Getting Married Was More Important Than A Big Wedding

Bindi Irwin posts a recap

Over the weekend, Irwin took to Instagram to convey a simple message: “Love wins.” Detailing some of the obstacles she and Powell had to overcome to make their special day happen, the former Dancing With The Stars champ emphasized that their commitment to each other took priority.

“This moment. My favorite wedding day photograph,” she wrote alongside the pic. “This isn’t the fairytale image capturing the ‘perfect’ wedding day feeling. In fact, it’s quite the opposite. This picture was taken after we had to change our entire wedding. We decided not to have wedding guests due to the global crisis for everyone’s health and safety. Our family and friends couldn’t be there to celebrate with us. However, they all encouraged us to continue on and get married. From their love and support, we felt love win.”

The Crikey! It’s the Irwins star revealed that in addition to changes in the guest list, the couple had to make adjustments to their menu and decorations.

View this post on Instagram

This moment. My favourite wedding day photograph. This isn’t the fairytale image capturing the ‘perfect’ wedding day feeling. In fact, it’s quite the opposite. This picture was taken after we had to change our entire wedding. We decided not to have wedding guests due to the global crisis for everyone’s health and safety. Our family and friends couldn’t be there to celebrate with us. However, they all encouraged us to continue on and get married. From their love and support, we felt love win. We changed our wedding date the night before we got married but we were determined to let love win. Everything from the cake to the flowers were different. Thankfully, we worked with local businesses to make it happen. They helped love win. On our wedding day we were finally about to get married and the paparazzi flew over us in a helicopter scaring our wildlife. We had to leave our stunning wedding venue on the African Savannah for their safety. I said goodbye to the place I had dreamed of getting married for so many years. At that moment I remembered the filming barn where I’d spent much of my life with my family working on Crocodile Hunter and Bindi The Jungle Girl. I knew we could make it work and our zoo crew helped us to move everything inside. I watched love win. I was there in my wedding dress, husband-to-be by my side, moving tables and flowers and trying to make our day finally become a reality. At one point I sat on a chair in the corner doing my best not to think about how overwhelming things seemed. I missed the people who couldn’t be there, my dad, Chandler’s family, our dear friends, my family. Chandler stopped what he was doing and sat next to me. I asked him to list me happy things. He proceeded to remind me that love ALWAYS wins. That’s when this picture was taken. Despite everything, we got married and I’ll forever be grateful. Sure, things weren’t perfect but that’s life. Life is messy and beautiful and meant to be felt. We were overcoming great obstacles to prove that unconditional love is the most important foundation. Our wedding day wasn’t what we planned but it was an extraordinary starting point for our marriage to bloom. ❤️

A post shared by Bindi Irwin (@bindisueirwin) on

“We changed our wedding date the night before we got married but we were determined to let love win,” Irwin wrote. “Everything from the cake to the flowers were different. Thankfully, we worked with local businesses to make it happen. They helped love win.”

The pesky paparazzi

Despite their modified wedding date and plans, Irwin and Powell still caught the attention of the press who wanted to get their own photos of the nuptials. Irwin referenced the disturbance the paparazzi caused to their already altered celebration.

“On our wedding day we were finally about to get married and the paparazzi flew over us in a helicopter scaring our wildlife,” Irwin stated. “We had to leave our stunning wedding venue on the African Savannah for their safety. I said goodbye to the place I had dreamed of getting married for so many years.”

Thankfully, the DWTS star thought of an alternate plan. “At that moment I remembered the filming barn where I’d spent much of my life with my family working on Crocodile Hunter and Bindi The Jungle Girl,” she explained. “I knew we could make it work and our zoo crew helped us to move everything inside. I watched love win.”

Noting the pic she posted, Irwin gave context to the special photo. “At one point I sat on a chair in the corner doing my best not to think about how overwhelming things seemed,” she wrote. “I missed the people who couldn’t be there, my dad, Chandler’s family, our dear friends, my family. Chandler stopped what he was doing and sat next to me… He proceeded to remind me that love ALWAYS wins. That’s when this picture was taken.”

Irwin concluded her post sharing what was most important, writing, “Our wedding day wasn’t what we planned but it was an extraordinary starting point for our marriage to bloom.”

RELATED: How Steve Irwin’s Kids Are Keeping His Memory Alive

Source: Read Full Article

The ending of Hulu’s Normal People explained

Hulu’s Normal People made its premiere on the streaming service on April 29, 2020, instantly captivating viewers with its story of friendship, love, and mental health — as well as the chemistry between its lead stars, Daisy Edgar-Jones and Paul Mescal. 

Based on Irish author Sally Rooney’s bestselling novel of the same name, the television adaptation of Normal People had been eagerly anticipated by fans since Hulu announced a straight-to-series order in May 2019. One year later, even people who hadn’t read Rooney’s sophomore novel found themselves totally engrossed in the love story of Marianne Sheridan and Connell Waldron — secondary school classmates whose lives remain intertwined as they navigate the hardships of college and adulthood. While Marianne and Connell are a far cry from Friends‘ Ross and Rachel or Jim and Pam’s dynamic on The Office, their on-again, off-again relationship is sure to be referenced as one of television’s most enthralling romances for years to come. 

While the television adaptation largely remained loyal to Rooney’s novel, a few creative liberties were taken while bringing the story to the screen. However, the series finale has left many viewers debating what’s next for Marianne and Connell. Here’s the ending of Hulu’s Normal People explained. Note: spoilers ahead!

How did Marianne and Connell's romance begin in Hulu's Normal People?

Hulu’s Normal People is, at its core, a love story — albeit a complicated one. And while every good love story must eventually come to an end, understanding the beginning of said love story is vital to understand its ending.

While Marianne Sheridan and Connell Waldron (played by Daisy Edgar-Jones and Paul Mescal, respectively) have a notably less tragic fate than Romeo and Juliet, they’re similar to Shakespeare’s famous young lovers in the way their differing social statuses force them to hide their romance when it begins in secondary school. Regarded as an outcast at school, Marianne comes from a very wealthy family. On the other hand, Connell is popular among his secondary school classmates and shares a close relationship with his working-class mother, Lorraine, who Marianne’s mother employs as a housekeeper, according to Elle

Despite caring for her behind closed doors, Connell is intimidated by what his friends might think of his romance with the unpopular Marianne and insists on keeping it a secret. Of course, this dynamic colors their romance for years to come, including the eventual end of their relationship.

Marianne's relationship with her mother plays a big role in Hulu's Normal People

Hulu’s Normal People might be a love story, but it’s far from a dreamy, storybook romance full of unicorns and magic. Instead, Normal People explores highly sensitive topics — depression, abuse, and toxic relationships — while showcasing the central romantic relationship. Marianne Sheridan’s relationship with her mother, Denise, is perhaps one of the most impactful relationships of the show, second only to her relationship with Connell Waldron. 

Throughout the series, Marianne is shown to have a complicated relationship with her mother, a wealthy widow. Denise is often portrayed as being cold toward her daughter and sympathetic to her temperamental son, Alan, despite his emotional abuse of Marianne. However, this fraught familial dynamic is later revealed to be a byproduct of Marianne’s late father, who physically abused her mother, as Harper’s Bazaar detailed.

By the end of the series, Marianne is no longer on speaking terms with Denise. However, while it’s easy to feel relieved that she’s finally freed herself from her toxic family, it’s hard not to imagine how different Marianne’s relationship with Connell would have been had she not grown up around abuse. 

Marianne has a series of toxic romantic relationships in Hulu's Normal People

While watching Hulu’s Normal People, you probably wanted to reach through the screen and point the series’ main characters in the right direction. This is especially true in the case of Marianne Sheridan, who is bullied throughout secondary school and plagued by her volatile home life and abusive brother — all such experiences shape her relationship with Connell Waldron, as well as her relationships with others. 

Throughout the entirety of the streaming series, viewers see Marianne find herself in a series of emotionally abusive relationships with incredibly toxic partners when she’s not with Connell. Gareth, Jamie, and Lukas are each problematic in their own ways — with the latter two taking pleasure in inflicting physical pain and emotional trauma on Marianne during so-called intimate encounters. 

Fortunately, Marianne’s relationships with these men don’t last for very long, as Connell is always the object of her desire. However, considering she and Connell don’t exactly end up together at the end of the series, it wouldn’t be farfetched to think Marianne may continue with this cycle of choosing toxic relationships with ill-suited partners. 

Hulu's Normal People lacks the inner monologues of its main characters

Hulu’s Normal People doesn’t veer very far from Sally Rooney’s 2018 novel of the same name. However, there are a few key differences between the book and the television adaptation that may influence the way viewers perceive the show’s ending. 

Perhaps the most striking difference between the novel and the show is the lack of inner monologues in the television adaptation, reported Harper’s Bazaar. Throughout Rooney’s novel, readers are given an inside glimpse at Marianne Sheridan and Connell Waldron’s true thoughts and motivations, subsequently making it easier to understand why the characters make the decisions they do — no matter how wrong those decisions may seem on the surface. However, the Hulu series doesn’t include the inner workings of Marianne and Connell’s minds and, as a result, some viewers could be left wondering why the two lovebirds keep sabotaging their relationship. 

While actors Daisy Edgar-Jones and Paul Mescal’s incredible portrayals of Marianne and Connell’s relationship certainly doesn’t lack emotion, perhaps a voiceover or two would help some viewers feel less confused about how the couple leaves things at the end of the series. 

Author Sally Rooney was instrumental in making Hulu's Normal People

Hulu’s adaptation of Normal People was largely seen as a hit, even if non-readers were let down by Marianne Sheridan and Connell Waldron’s relationship at the end of the series. However, considering the author of Normal People, Sally Rooney, served as an executive producer and co-writer of the show, according to the Los Angeles Times, it’s safe to say the series ended exactly as it was supposed to.

According to Paul Mescal, who portrays Connell Waldron in the Hulu series, Rooney was a constant guide throughout the filming process — even from far away. “Sally was actually writing a new novel in New York, so she wasn’t particularly present all the time on set, but she had a very big input via producers and directors, and it was great to feel her approval throughout the shooting process,” Mescal revealed to Harper’s Bazaar in April 2020.

Daisy Edgar-Jones, who brought Marianne Sheridan to life onscreen, said she hopes the show lives up to Rooney’s expectations. The star told Harper’s Bazaar, “It must be crazy for her, because she created these characters and now we’re all talking about them!”

Hulu's Normal People made a change to this pivotal ending scene

Considering Hulu’s Normal People is a television adaptation of a beloved book, producers of the series undoubtedly felt enormous pressure to please fans of Sally Rooney’s work. Fortunately, as fans of both the show and book can attest, the Hulu series made a noticeable effort to stay true to its source material. In fact, according to the Los Angeles Times, the “unofficial motto” of the show’s filmmakers consisted of five simple words: “The book is the bible.”

Still, as executive producer and director Lenny Abrahamson revealed to the The Hollywood Reporter in May 2020, one particular scene in the series finale played out a bit differently than it did in Rooney’s bestselling novel. “A scene that was one scene in the novel becomes two scenes separated by a passage of time at the end of the adaptation,” Abrahamson revealed, referring to the scene in which Connell Waldron tells Marianne Sheridan he’s been accepted to grad school in New York City. According to Abrahamson, the choice to split the pivotal scene was best “from a screen storytelling point of view.”

Hulu's Normal People star Daisy Edgar-Jones has expressed concern about her character's fate

Normal People definitely made a splash when it premiered on Hulu. Not only did the series captivate viewers with its storytelling and gorgeous cinematography, it also introduced its main stars — newcomers Paul Mescal and Daisy Edgar-Jones — to the world. 

Speaking with Nylon in April 2020, Edgar-Jones revealed why she was drawn to the role of Marianne Sheridan. “I loved how she had this deep inner life,” Edgar-Jones told the publication. She continued, saying, “It’s the first time I’d ever read a female character that was so incredibly flawed and complicated.”

Nevertheless, the star also expressed concern over the mental and emotional well-being of her Normal People character. When asked what she hoped for Marianne at the end of the series, Edgar-Jones told Nylon, “I think she feels she doesn’t deserve the goodness that she gets from people like Connell. So I hope that she remains able to believe that she deserves kindness in her life.” The star continued, saying, “I think as long as she’s happy just being steady and comfortable and not feel unworthy anymore — that’s what I hope for Marianne.”

Sally Rooney has revealed if Normal People's Marianne and Connell stay together

Hulu’s Normal People didn’t have a tragic ending per say, but for fans wanting to see Marianne Sheridan and Connell Waldron end up together once and for all, the final episode was likely somewhat disappointing.

In the 12th episode of Normal People, viewers watched as Marianne and Connell agreed to part ways, as Connell decided to accepted a grad school opportunity in New York City. However, if you’ve found yourself wondering if the on-again, off-again lovers ever find their way back to each other after Normal People ends, we have good news: Normal People author Sally Rooney has already answered that question with her short story.

Published in 2016, At the Clinic was the basis for the subsequent Normal People novel and follows Marianne and Connell for a longer period of time. Readers learn that, at 23 years old, the pair travels to have Marianne’s wisdom tooth removed,Vogue detailed. As Rooney herself explained to The TelegraphAt the Clinic inspired her to explore the couple’s relationship with more depth, which she ultimately did in Normal People. And, according to the short story, Marianne and Connell’s relationship is still as passionate as ever, though the two are seemingly facing the same problems as before.

The stars of Hulu's Normal People "don't know what's on the other side" for their characters

If Hulu’s Normal People left you with more questions than it did answers about the future of Marianne Sheridan and Connell Waldron’s relationship, you’re not alone. According to the stars of Normal People, Daisy Edgar-Jones and Paul Mescal, they’re just as unsure as the rest of the world when it comes to what’s next for their characters. After all, the Hulu series covered the entirety of Sally Rooney’s bestselling 2018 novel, which left the nature of Marianne and Connell’s relationship largely up for interpretation. 

However, Edgar-Jones and Mescal don’t seem to think that’s such a bad thing. “We don’t know what’s on the other side,” Mescal told New Musical Express in April 2020. He continued, saying, “The great thing about these two characters is that their lives continue.”

Edgar-Jones shared her thoughts, saying, “At the end, they’re very much alive and you’re left not knowing where they’re gonna go.” She continued, telling the publication, “We’ve left the series in a similar way. I think it’s quite interesting to leave it open.”

What happened to Connell's chain at the end of Hulu's Normal People?

Hulu’s Normal People has taken the world by storm and the same rings true for its stars, Daisy Edgar-Jones and Paul Mescal. However, many fans finished the final episode of the Hulu adaptation wondering about the fate of an unexpected breakout star: the silver chain worn by Mescal’s Connell Waldron throughout the series. 

Connell’s chain garnered quite a large fanbase upon the debut of Normal People, even scoring its own Instagram account. Yes, @connellschain raked in 174,000 followers by June 1, 2020. “Probably the last thing I expected to garner a response was Connell’s chain,” Mescal mused when speaking to Variety

As for what’s happened to the chain now that filming has wrapped, Mescal dished to Variety that it’s in the care of his co-star — or, at least, he thinks it is. Explaining that he’d gifted the chain to Edgar-Jones at the end of filming, the actor revealed it later got lost by the time he had to borrow it to wear for a photo shoot. Fortunately, however, it was located by the show’s costume designer. “I think Daisy has it now,” Mescal told the publication. 

Daisy Edgar-Jones spoiled the ending of Hulu's Normal People

Although readers of Sally Rooney’s Normal People had an idea of how the Hulu series would end, the ending may have been spoiled for those who hadn’t delved into the novel. Unfortunately, the spoilers happened to come from one of the show’s breakout stars, Daisy Edgar-Jones.

Edgar-Jones, who portrays Marianne Sheridan on the television adaptation of Normal People, seemed to have a major slip up during a May 2020 appearance on The One Show (via Express). When host Alex Jones asked her where she’d like to see Marianne and her love interest, Connell Waldron, the actress responded, “I hope they remain at that level of settled they get to by the end of the series and I think it is wonderful that Marianne encouraged Connell to follow his dreams as a writer in New York.”

Unfortunately, the final episode had not yet aired, meaning Edgar-Jones’ comments took many viewers by surprise. “Oh dear, Daisy Edgar-Jones just unwittingly spoiled the ending of Normal People on [The One Show],” one fan tweeted in response. However, to her credit, Edgar-Jones never disclosed if Marianne and Connell would try to make a long-distance relationship last.

Will there be a second season of Hulu's Normal People?

When Hulu’s Normal People came to an end with its 12th episode, the first question on many viewers’ minds was likely the same: Will there be a second season of the steamy romantic drama? 

As it turns out, fans aren’t the only ones who think a second season might not be such a crazy idea — even if the initial season of the Hulu series covered the entirety of Sally Rooney’s bestselling 2018 novel of the same name. “I remember finishing the novel thinking, ‘I wonder what the next phase of their lives is going to be like,'” executive producer and director Lenny Abrahamson revealed in an April 2020 interview with the Los Angeles Times. He continued, saying,  “So it’s something we should probably think about. It depends on how Sally feels, if she feels she’s finished their story.”

According to producer Ed Guiney, though, fans shouldn’t hold their breath for a second season. “It feels like we tell a very complete story about these characters’ lives, and so [a second season is] not something we’re moving to do,” the producer revealed to The Hollywood Reporter. However, he made sure to leave fans with a little hope. “Maybe there’s a version of it down the line,” he added.

Source: Read Full Article

Where Is 'Making the Cut' Runner-Up Esther Perbrandt Now?

You might recognize Tim Gunn and Heidi Klum from their hit fashion competition show, Project Runway. But in 2020, Gunn and Klum started an entirely new fashion competition show together named Making the Cut which premiered on Amazon Prime TV in March. The show follows talented fashion designers as they fly around the world to places like Tokyo, competing in reality TV show competitions along the way.

Making the Cut is different and, arguably, better than Project Runway in many ways, and one of the star examples of that “difference” was the presence of Berlin designer Esther Perbrandt, whose uniqueness fans loved so much that she ended up being the runner-up of the entire competition.

So what made Perbrandt so different from her competition, and what has she been up to these days?

Esther Perbrandt was a unique contestant

RELATED: Heidi Klum Says Amazon Agreed to Every ‘Making the Cut’ Idea Except One

Perbrandt immediately stood out on the show for her minimalist, all-black fashion. Her clothes have a very distinct look which she has described as “too rock and roll” for Paris and “too chic” for Berlin.

Fans fell in love with her authentic style and her unwillingness to change her identity for the show. She was the “all-black” designer through and through; “Black is endless, timeless, positive, and healthy. It makes people beautiful and lets them glow,” she stated for Interview Magazine.

Despite her unique style, Perbrandt made it to the very last round of the show, where she competed and lost against designer Jonny Cota, whose clothes were thought to be more commercial. The final competition wasn’t unanimous, though: Cota only won by a 3-to-2 vote.

Perbrandt was born and raised in Berlin, which really shines through in her all-black aesthetic. She also did a three-month fashion internship in Moscow, a time that she credits for her current look. It’s clear that Perbrandt was influenced by a lot of different time periods in her life to make her into the designer she is today.

Perbrandt refused to change for the show

When asked by Reality Blurred reporter Andy Dehnart if she felt like the judges tried to change her for the show, Perbrandt replied honestly: “I think they really tried. I was expecting that. When I knew that I will be one of the participants, I knew this would be a big issue, my black. I tried really hard and that was really tiring for me in each session with the judges to fight again for my universe.”

At the same time, Perbrandt says that she actually feels grateful for needing to defend her style and voice time after time to the judges.

“[T]hat made me so strong, and by standing there again and again and fighting for it, made it so much stronger—stronger, I think, than it was before,” she told Reality Blurred, adding: “It was really good school, and yeah I’m thankful for all their really hard critiques.”

What has Perbrandt been up to since the show ended?

Basically, Perbrandt reports to Reality Blurred that since the show stopped filming last year, she has mainly been working hard on gearing up for the explosion of fame and media attention for her brand that she expected to come once Making the Cut was released. It seems that she’s been focusing more on the business aspect of things and creating a website, Instagram, and SEO strategy for her brand.

She states that moving forward, she’s not completely unwilling to change her aesthetic: “The market is changing, the world is changing; if I don’t change myself and my brand, I will have to close one day,” she admits.

Fans can only hope that Perbrandt doesn’t change the aesthetic that they love too much!

Source: Read Full Article

The 4 things you need to know about coronavirus – as we come out of lockdown – The Sun

CORONAVIRUS infections first began cropping up back in December in Wuhan in China. 

Now, nearly six months on, there have been a staggering 372,000 deaths worldwide from Covid-19 and over 6.15million known cases.

⚠️ Read our coronavirus live blog for the latest news & updates

And as lockdowns are now beginning ease, scientists worldwide are engaged in an unprecedented search for new therapies and a race for vaccine development.

Every day we learn more about the virus that causes Covid-19, known as SARS-CoV-2, but as many of us venture back out into the world, there is still much that we don’t know about immunity to infection.

Here, Dr Zania Stamataki, Senior Lecturer in Viral Immunology at the University of Birmingham, writes for The Conversation about what we have learnt so far about Covid-19 and some key questions that still need answering…

1. Who is most at risk of severe disease?

The first data following several thousand infections from China identified certain vulnerable groups at risk of severe symptoms leading to fatality: older people and those with underlying medical conditions are most at risk.

But now we have a clearer picture that shows more people than that are being affected.

We have seen in numerous countries that younger people with no pre-existing conditions can die from Covid-19, which can cause symptoms affecting multiple organs and parts of the body, from the brain to the toes.

The good news: not everyone is displaying all these symptoms and most infected people will recover well.

But it is important to understand why some otherwise healthy people succumb to infection.

It is important to understand why some otherwise healthy people succumb to infection

To achieve this, scientists are looking for clues in the blood of patients with severe symptoms to use them as biomarkers of high risk.

To fully appreciate who is most at risk, we need a better understanding of both the virus and the host.

It is too early to speak of different viral strains, but early sequencing data identify mutations that help us build a picture of virus distribution in different parts of the world.

We can also use antibody testing to map who has been infected within our population.

A study in over 500 healthcare workers in the UK showed that housekeeping staff had a higher incidence of previous infection compared to clinicians working in intensive care and emergency medicine.

These studies help us understand who is most at risk of infection at work.

2. How does Covid-19 affect children?

Children are the least affected by Covid-19, and show the lowest incidence of mild or severe symptoms.

Fatalities in children have been extremely rare, but those severely affected show hallmarks of hyper-immune activation similar to that found in Kawasaki disease.

The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control issued a rapid risk assessment that highlighted uncertainties in paediatric Covid-19: we don’t know yet how many children may be infected and asymptomatic, and due to the delayed onset of the disease, there are sparse data connecting it to the virus.

Emerging studies using antibody tests are beginning to shed light on this problem.

Despite the rarity of symptoms in children, it is important to find out if they have become infected and whether they can transmit the virus. This information will help us safeguard vulnerable groups.

It is practically difficult to document child-to-adult transmission because children with mild or asymptomatic infections are not routinely tested for Covid-19.

However, a study from Germany showed that infected children carried a similar viral load to adults.

If this translates to infectious virus, then children could be as contagious as adults.

3. Are those who have recovered immune?

The question of immunity is a crucial one that will drive policy on antiviral precautions.

Previous exposure to a pathogen usually leads to resistance to reinfection, but this is not always the case.

Immune memory is when our body remembers a previous infection and acts faster to control it during later encounters, and this is the idea behind vaccination.

Some viral infections are cleared before the immune system manages to develop memory responses.

Others induce antibodies that make future reinfections from similar viruses more dangerous.

Most infected people resolve SARS-CoV-2 infection within two weeks, and most develop antibodies recognising the virus. So how can we find out if this is evidence for immune protection?

The fact that we are able to produce antibodies holds hope for vaccination

A major clue came from a study from New York where scientists found potent neutralising antibodies in people who had recovered from coronavirus without severe symptoms.

Neutralising antibodies are those that block the virus from infecting our cells.

Although the amounts of antibodies varied, the fact that we are able to produce them holds hope for vaccination.

Cell-based immunity can also offer protection from reinfection. T cells are immune cells that kill infected cells to limit virus production, and they are able to generate memory cells after first exposure to a virus.

We now appreciate that most patients have detectable virus-specific T cells, and that some healthy people also have T cells specific for the virus, which could be remnants of infection with other coronaviruses.

We now need to establish whether the antibodies and the T cells that we can make after infection are of sufficient quantity and quality to protect us from reinfection.

4. It’s realistic to be optimistic

There is a lot we still don’t know about this coronavirus, but we have nonetheless learned enough to help us make some firm conclusions:

  • We recognise vulnerable groups that need most shielding to preserve life, but we still need biomarkers that predict risk for those outside these groups.
  • We have the tests to detect antibodies in recovered children and adults, and we can use this information to understand what happens to our immune systems after infection with the virus.
  • We can detect the hallmarks of immune memory in people who recovered, and this bodes well for vaccine development.

Based on this, there are actions we can take in the short term. We know how coronavirus transmits from person to person so we can take necessary precautions to feel safe.

We may inhale virus expelled in droplets from an infected carrier directly, or transfer the virus from a contaminated surface to our faces.

Strategies to avoid this are possible, including physical distancing and washing our hands with soap.

If we wear face coverings when outside, we can limit shedding droplets that risk infecting other people even if we show no symptoms of the disease.


Don't miss the latest news and figures – and essential advice for you and your family.

To receive The Sun's Coronavirus newsletter in your inbox every tea time, sign up here.
To follow us on Facebook, simply 'Like' our Coronavirus page.
Get Britain's best-selling newspaper delivered to your smartphone or tablet each day – find out more.

Source: Read Full Article

King of Bhutan releases the first photos of his three-month-old son

First look at the new Prince of Bhutan: King releases photos of his three-month-old son to mark his wife’s 30th birthday (and proud big brother the Dragon Prince, four, can’t help stealing a peek!)

  • King and Queen of Bhutan have shared the first photos of their youngest son
  • The royal couple announced the birth of the baby boy in early March 
  • They are also parents to a four-year-old boy known as the Dragon Prince 
  • New family photos were released to mark the queen’s 30th birthday this week 

The King and Queen of Bhutan have released the first photos of their three-month-old son.  

King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck, 40, and Queen Jetsun Pema shared their first photos as a family-of-four on Facebook yesterday.

The couple are already parents to four-year-old Prince Jigme Namgyel Wangchuck, known as the Dragon Prince, who is seen smiling proudly at his baby brother in the new photographs. The baby’s name has not yet been announced.

The snaps were taken in the grounds of Lingkana Palace in the Bhutanese capital of Thimphu and were released to mark the queen’s 30th birthday this week. 

King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck, 40, and Queen Jetsun Pema shared their first photos as a family-of-four on Facebook yesterday. The couple are already parents to four-year-old Prince Jigme Namgyel Wangchuck, known as the Dragon Prince, who is seen smiling proudly

The snaps were taken in the grounds of Lingkana Palace in the Bhutanese capital of Thimphu and were released to mark the queen’s 30th birthday this week. Pictured, the family together

Sharing the photos on the official King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck Facebook page, the royal family wrote: ‘To commemorate the 30th Birth Anniversary of Her Majesty The Gyaltsuen on the 4th of June, it is our privilege to share a wonderful collection of photographs of the Royal Family.

‘These Kupars were taken at the Lingkana Palace grounds on the 29th of May. His Royal Highness’ name will be announced in the coming days.

‘With deepest gratitude and love on this special occasion, we offer our prayers for the lasting happiness and health of our Beloved Queen, Her Majesty The Gyaltsuen.’  

Their oldest son, Prince Jigme Namgyel Wangchuck, is the heir to the Bhutanese throne. King Jigme, the hugely popular fifth Druk Gyalpo, studied in the UK and the US and ascended the throne in 2006, aged just 26 after his own father abdicated. 

The King, known as the Dragon King, with both of his sons. The couple’s oldest son, Prince Jigme Namgyel Wangchuck, pictured right, is the heir to the Bhutanese throne 

Unlike his son, who plans to have a monogamous marriage, the former King, who introduced democracy to Bhutan during his reign, has four wives, all sisters who he married on the same day. 

But despite his own upbringing, the current monarch has made clear that he only plans to have one wife, whom he married on October 13, 2011, when she was still an international relations student at Regent’s College in London.

The match made headlines at the time because the young King was more openly affectionate with his wife than citizens were used to – leaving the couple to be called ‘the William and Kate of the Himalayas’. 

However, his very public displays of affection – which included kissing his wife on the cheek and holding her hand – was well-received by young people, with many even choosing to follow the royals’ example. 

The photos were released to mark the queen’s 30th birthday this week. Pictured, the queen cradling her baby boy, whose name has not yet been announced

Source: Read Full Article

As we tear down the Covid wall, we see our ruling class being caught short – The Sun

WE are basking in the sunniest springtime on record . . . ten glorious weeks in lonely lockdown, keeping well clear of our nearest and dearest.

By the time they sound the all-clear, normal British wind and drizzle will resume. What a waste.

⚠️ Read our coronavirus live blog for the latest news & updates

We have been incarcerated by experts who allowed a non-epidemic with a comparatively low death rate to crash our way of life, wreck jobs and prosperity — and put far more lives at risk from other causes.

Now people are taking matters into their own hands.

Police stand idle as frustrated citizens cry freedom, tear down the Covid Wall and burst on to streets, beaches and parks.

Millions stomped over today’s official deadline and spent the whole weekend mixing with friends and family.

If the pubs can’t open, they bring their own.

In a surprise but welcome move on Sunday, 2.2million shielded people were told their self-isolation is over.

Officials are rushing to keep up. But they need to move faster.

They must clear up the anomalies and inconsistencies that turn us all into rule-breaking rebels.

Why, for instance, are public toilets closed, forcing people to use bushes and trees for cover?

“Sorry for the inconvenience” won’t wash.

Why are gyms and swimming pools closed? What about hairdressers?

Why should we risk two weeks’ quarantine for flying on holiday?

And why, in God’s name, are churches closed?

Most importantly, why do we cling to the daft two-metre rule?

Boris Johnson wants it reduced but is barred by Sage, the bickering coven of experts that holds Downing Street hostage.

The World Health Organisation recommends one metre.

This would allow a massive 75 per cent more floorspace per person — a lifesaver for pubs, restaurants, sports stadiums and a return to near-normal life.

Indeed, it is already happening.

On parks and riverbanks, people casually brush shoulders just to keep pedestrian traffic flowing. Few bother with masks. But they desperately need loos.

All of a sudden, politicians are asking if lockdown was necessary after all.

Norwegian PM Erna Solberg on Sunday became the first national leader to confess hers was a panic-driven mistake.

“Was it necessary to close schools?” she asked.

“Perhaps not. I probably took many of the decisions out of fear.”

Next-door Sweden famously refused to lock down.

Its death rate from coronavirus, higher than Norway’s, is well below Britain’s.


To be fair, nobody knew three months ago if we faced a 21st-century Black Death.

We were spooked by the authoritarian response in Wuhan province, China, where Covid-19 began.

We’ve learned a lot since then.

We know those most at risk have pre-existing health problems, which include obesity, diabetes and old age — which is no consolation, of course, to those who die before their time. Children who have lost a term’s schooling are effectively immune and don’t spread the virus.

We know thousands are missing life-saving early diagnosis and treatment for non-Covid diseases.

We know depression, drugs and domestic abuse are costing lives.

Yet there are virtually no new cases of Covid outside hospitals and care homes.

Scientists think the virus was already petering out as the world pulled down the shutters.

They can find no evidence that ending lockdown leads to a deadly second wave.

How did we end up in this state of paralysed confusion?

The question must be put as soon as possible to a public inquiry led by a figure of impeccable authority.

It will inevitably focus on “the Blob” — the well-meaning but short-sighted officials who think they run the country.

If the inquiry does its job, it will shake up the vast NHS bureaucracy, bungling Public Health England and the poorly named Sage committee of scientific experts.

It will find out if the so-called Care Quality Commission let down care homes and why the Cabinet Office Civil Contingencies Secretariat was caught with its pants down.

It will swiftly provide the basis for a shake-up of the entire civil service, whose mandarin class desperately needs reform as Britain takes on the world after Brexit.

Luvvies keep on losing

LABOUR’S seething, self-righteous, Brexit-hating luvvies have done us a favour with the confected Dominic Cummings saga.

Their foam-flecked four-letter fury is matched only by their hypocrisy.

Alastair Campbell is a sad relic of his former self. Newsnight’s Emily Maitlis has removed all doubt about her rancid Tory hatred.

They are as much to blame for the spiteful mob outside Cummings’ home as beneath-contempt Emily Thornberry.

But they all come last behind self-described “farting fatty” Miriam Margolyes, who wished Boris Johnson dead as he fought for breath in intensive care.

  • GOT a news story? RING us on 0207 782 4104 or WHATSAPP on 07423720250 or EMAIL [email protected]

Source: Read Full Article

Netflix: The Biggest Movies and Shows Leaving in June 2020

The introduction of HBO Max could change the game for streaming services. After all, the conversation is moving away from classic movies and shows. And Netflix, in particular, is focusing on developing more original content. But those subscribers who want one last chance to clear a few items off their queue will need to act fast before these hits exit in June 2020.

Some long-running TV favorites are leaving Netflix in the coming weeks

Netflix has a lot of original shows in the pipeline. But the streaming service has lost many classic TV shows. A few more are heading out in June 2020. First, on June 9, all seven seasons of Mad Men will exit the platform. The AMC drama made household names of stars like Jon Hamm and Elisabeth Moss. So fans will need to catch up fast before it exits Netflix.

Likewise, The Andy Griffith Show and Cheers will be leaving in June 2020. Both comedies were breakout hits in their respective times. From 1960 to 1968, Andy Griffith starred as the sheriff of Mayberry for eight seasons. And Ted Danson and his Cheers castmates headlined the iconic, award-winning sitcom for 11 seasons. Both shows leave Netflix on June 30.

RELATED: A Crazy Amount of People Have Signed Up for Disney+ But Will Its Success Mean the End of Netflix?

‘Avengers: Infinity War’ and other movies are jumping over to Disney+

With Disney+ still going strong, the House of Mouse is taking a few of its movies off Netflix. And surprising no one, they are all set to hit Disney’s own streaming service just a few days later. On June 22, both Tarzan and its direct-to-video sequel will leave Netflix. They will then hit Disney+ on June 26, where they’ll join most of Disney other animated classics.

That very same day, Avengers: Infinity War will debut on Disney+. The 2018 release is one of only two Marvel Cinematic Universe movies left on Netflix. With just Ant-Man and the Wasp left on Netflix after June 24, this could be the push some Marvel fans need to sign up for Disney+. The Marvel Netflix shows remain some of the only Marvel projects still on the service.

RELATED: 5 of the Best Marvel Movies to Watch on Disney+ Right Now

‘Ferris Bueller’s Day Off,’ ‘The Matrix,’ and others are heading out

One of the best things about Netflix — or any streaming service really — is the ability to sit back and rewatch an old favorite. To that end, subscribers might like to know that several beloved comedies are leaving in June 2020. Comedy hits like Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, Chasing Amy, and Scary Movie will all be leaving Netflix on June 30.

Likewise, blockbuster hits like Cloverfield, The Mask of Zorro, and The Ring are all leaving Netflix in June. Fans who are hoping to check back in with The Matrix and its sequels ahead of the 2021 release of the untitled fourth movie should do so now. The Wachowskis’ 1999 classic (and its follow-ups) are leaving as well.

Source: Read Full Article