Tamar Braxton’s Family Was Stunned When She Shaved Her Hair in 2018

Since becoming the breakout star of Braxton Family Values, Tamar Braxton has become known for her perceived dramatic antics and love of flare. When it comes to her appearance, she enjoys extra flare and her wigs are no exception. Fans could always count on her to deliver a flawless, long, and typically blonde wig look – which is why many were shocked when she debuted a buzz cut in 2018. Braxton recently revealed her famous family was stunned when she emerged bald. 

Tamar Braxton debuts buzz cut

Ahead of Braxton’s 41st birthday, the singer and reality star hinted to fans that she would be debuting a new look. At a minimum, fans expected a different hair color. Though known to rock various shades of blonde, Braxton was known to switch it up from time to time with a black or red look. 

But she took her social media users for a surprise when she posted a now-deleted video of her sitting in a chair as a stylist shaved her hair. Many fans assumed that the choice was a declaration of new-found freedom and independence for the singer as just months prior, she’d filed divorce paperwork to end her nearly nine-year marriage to Vincent Herbert. Bobby Brown’s hit single “My Prerogative” played in the background as Braxton sat calmly while a stylist ran pink clippers ran through her hair.

Related: Tamar Braxton Says Family Therapy Helped Her and Ex-Husband, Vincent Herbert, Become Friends Post-Divorce

A day later, Braxton posted a series of professionally shot photos of her smiling and posing with her new baldie. “I’m over feeling captive to a wig, weave, people, people’s comments & opinions hell…even my OWN feelings!” she captioned one of the photos. “WE can choose to stop these things from having the power and victory over us!! And for me, that starts TODAY.”

Tamar Braxton says her family thought she was going through a mental health crisis when she shaved her head

While Braxton was excited about her new baldie and went hairless with pride, her family were shocked and confused at what they considered to be a drastic change. In a new interview with Page Six, Braxton shared that she received dozens of questions from her loved ones on her new look as she did not give anyone a heads up.

“My family did get on me. It was a natural reaction with my sisters and girlfriends. They were like, ‘Girl, what you are you going through? Are you all right? Do I need to come see you? Do you need some help? When was the last time you ate?’ I got all of that,” she said.

She took the questions head-on and insists that the haircut was not a reactionary decision regarding anything going on in her personal life. Instead, she said it was her way of ridding herself of the beauty standards she’d abided by for so long, especially with being in the public eye.

“When someone cuts their hair, it is not always [because of] a negative mental issue,” she said. “Sometimes you’ve got to build yourself up to get ready to fight the world. I used to feel pressured to look a certain way in Hollywood, but I don’t anymore. I think you can rely on your talent and work ethic to speak for yourself; that’s what I do now.”

Braxton has since returned to wearing wigs and weaves for protective styling options as she grows her hair out but admitted that her buzz cut is her most beloved hairstyle. She’s considering cutting it again.

Source: Read Full Article

Marvel: Why Was Bucky So Surprised When He Met Spider-Man for the First Time?

Going back and analyzing when The Avengers met one another during the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) timeline can still bring some interesting insights into how they felt about one another. Initial impressions at first meetings can always be different from how things turn out once thrown into a mission to save the world.

One can say that about Bucky Barnes and Spider-Man, a team-up that nobody really talks about too much. They really are as far apart as one could imagine in terms of age and experience. Nevertheless, when they first met in Captain America: Civil War, things really went wrong.

Maybe many will consider the first meeting between Steve Rogers and Sam Wilson the most memorable of all. Even so, that Spidey/Bucky meeting does bring back some chortles.

How did Bucky Barnes and Spider-Man get along at first meeting?

Fans have to go back four years to when The Avengers split up into two warring factions to see when Bucky first encountered Spider-Man. Of course, Bucky was acting as The Winter Soldier and had his memories restored about his time with Steve Rogers in the ’40s.

Prior to Civil War, though, Bucky had not yet met all The Avengers. His first meeting with Spider-Man was not a friendly one. It was during the throes of battle, a scene posted on Reddit recently by a user.

The above still shot is a tad funny because the original thread starter suggested Bucky was laughing when first catching sight of Spider-Man. Many will remember Bucky and Sam Wilson were running and happened to spot Spider-Man crawling through an upper airport walkway.

Fighting had already broken out in this setting, complete with Captain America fighting War Machine and Ant-Man battling Natasha Romanoff.

What did Bucky and Sam say when spotting Spider-Man?

It was Bucky who caught sight of Spider-Man first and yelled out “who is that”? Sam, as his usual droll self, replied “everyone has a gimmick now.”

Yes, talk about the most awkward first meeting. Within minutes, Spidey and Bucky were eye-to-eye after the former knocked Sam aside. Just as Bucky was going to use his metal arm to knock Spider-Man senseless, the latter intervened. Spider-Man quips to Bucky: “You have a metal arm? That is awesome dude!”

No doubt Bucky was a bit shocked to hear a squeaky teen voice emanate out of Spider-Man, a superhero he never had interacted with prior. Little did he know he would eventually work alongside him and the others to take on a greater cause when Thanos became a threat.

What makes that first meeting even more hilarious is neither Bucky nor Sam apparently knew how web-slinging worked either.

Spider-Man using his webs to tie down Bucky and Sam

With each taking swipes at each other during the above fight sequence, Spider-Man manages to use his web-slinging abilities to tie Bucky and Sam to the pavement. At one point, Sam yells out: “That’s coming out of you?”, proving the first-time interaction with Spider-Man is usually perplexing.

Then Sam releases one of his flying weapons from his Falcon suit, flinging Spider-Man out a glass window in the terminal. Bucky, lying on the ground, utters “you couldn’t have done that earlier?“

As many laughs as this sequence brings, it was a rare opportunity to see how first-time superhero meetings frequently never go over well. Even if there was no civil war underway, egos might have made a meeting between Bucky and Spidey a bit tense.

With such a huge compendium of superheroes besides, seeing them meet and slowly become friends is sometimes interesting to behold. An easy argument could be made none of them would have formed an emotional bond with each other later without Thanos threatening civilization.

Source: Read Full Article

Why Rapper Dave East Was Arrested

Rapper Dave East has been noted as one of the greatest talents in hip hop to look out for. He’s also been praised for his acting chops, having starred in the hit Hulu series Wu-Tang, the rap supergroup. East typically keeps a low-profile but the rapper is making headlines after being taken into custody for unlawful possession of marijuana and disorderly conduct during a traffic stop. 

Who is Dave East?

East started rapping in 2010. The Harlem, New York-born talent sold drugs simultaneously to support himself while he pursued music and independently released mixtapes. He received widespread attention after his eighth mixtape, Black Rose, was released in 2014. Rapper Nas was impressed and signed East to his record label, Mass Appeal Records, a subdivision of Def Jam Records.

View this post on Instagram

Cover Of @respectthemag Respectfully…

A post shared by SHOOTER 🌎 (@daveeast) on

After signing with Nas, East was selected to appear on the 2016 cover of XXL Magazine as part of the publication’s Freshman Class. The much-anticipated issue puts a spotlight on upcoming rappers and urban acts believed to be the next big thing. His mixtape Kairi Chanel was released the same year and debuted at the No. 38 spot on the US Billboard 200. His first debut studio album, Extended Play, Paranoia: A True Story, was released in 2017 and peaked at No. 9 on the US Billboard 200. 

East has expanded his resume outside of music by acting. He started in 2017 by appearing as himself on shows like BET’s Being Mary Jane alongside Gabrielle Union – and a guest appearance on The Breaks. He also had a supporting role in the 2019 Netflix film Beats as “Mister Ford.” His biggest role was part of the Hulu series Wu-Tang: An American Saga, where he starred as rapper Method Man. 

Dave East arrested for disorderly conduct and possession of marijuana

East has had trouble with the law before. He served a prison sentence before his career took off and during his stint, he converted to become a Muslim. He’s been open about how religion has centered him and provided a foundation of discipline that he says he lacked previously. Having a daughter has also had a positive impact on his life.

View this post on Instagram

My Bestfriend The Last 4 Years 😍

A post shared by SHOOTER 🌎 (@daveeast) on

Unfortunately, East has found himself in more legal trouble. TMZ reported on May 22 that he was pulled over failing to signal a turn in the Queens section of New York. Upon the stop, cops claim they smelled a strong stitch of marijuana as they approached the driver’s side. Cops requested identification and the driver complied but the publication noted that East nor the other passenger of the SUV provided ID.  

Law enforcement told TMZ that seven bags of marijuana were found in the SUV. East and the other passenger were taken into custody but not the driver. Both were cited with violations of disorderly conduct and unlawful possession of marijuana. 

The rapper’s attorney, Stacey Richman, told the media outlet that she does not believe East has been charged, nor does she believe will it result in a criminal conviction as both disorderly conduct and unlawful possession of marijuana are not crimes in the state of New York. 

As to why the driver was not taken into custody, the reasoning is unknown. The arrest took place just hours before East was scheduled to attend a funeral for a close friend. 

Source: Read Full Article

Princess Diana Was Hiding a Big Secret When Photographers Caught Her Sleeping in Her Chair

There are so many photos of Princess Diana that reveal her truefeelings. From the moments where she’s caught looking away from PrinceCharles in disgust to the carefully staged photo of her sitting alone in frontof the Taj Mahal, it was easy for royal followers to see precisely how Diana feltmost of the time.

But those royal subjects did not immediately know the reason behind one famous photo of Princess Diana sitting upright in a chair sleeping during the middle of a big event. However, just one day later they would find out the very good reason the Princess of Wales had for being so tired.

Princess Diana earned the nickname ‘Sleeping Beauty’ for falling asleep in a chair

RELATED: Photo of Princess Diana Alone at the Taj Mahal ‘Broke Everybody’s Hearts,’ and Made Prince Charles ‘Absolutely Crazy,’ Royal Expert Says

The photo in question shows Diana at the Splendours of theGonzagas Exhibition Gala, which occurred on Nov. 4, 1981. At the time, she andPrince Charles had only beenmarried for just over three months and Diana was just getting used to royallife. In other words, maybe she didn’t realize it was inappropriate to sleepthrough events.

But really there was a much better reason for the20-year-old new bride to be so visibly exhausted.

Diana had just found out she was pregnant with PrinceWilliam

The reason Princess Diana could barely keep her eyes open atan evening event was that she was in her first trimester of pregnancy. Afterthe photo of Diana sleeping was splashed all over the papers, Buckingham Palacereleased the official announcement that the Prince and Princess of Wales wereexpecting their first child.

Prince William was born on June 21, 1982. His youngerbrother Prince Harry followed a few years behind on Sept. 15, 1984.

Prince Charles and Princess Diana were unhappy from thestart

Though they had a few shining moments of happiness, Charles and Diana were miserable together, even at the very start of their marriage. They didn’t know each other well when they got engaged and like the rest of the world, Diana was quite aware that Charles was still in love with his ex-girlfriend, Camilla Parker Bowles.

If anything was going to save their marriage, it was their children. Diana loved being a mother and was willing to sacrifice so much for the sake of motherhood.

Diana devoted her life to William and Harry

RELATED: This Woman Quietly Stepped in As Mother to Prince William and Prince Harry After Princess Diana Died

She may not have had an idyllic marriage, but Diana wasthrilled to become a mom. “William has brought us such happiness andcontentment and consequently I can’t wait for masses more,” Diana said of becominga mom, USAToday reported. Ultimately, she would only have one more child, though it’sevident she desired more.

Rumor has it that the happiest time of Charles and Diana’s marriage was right before Prince Harry was born when they still thought he might be a girl. The Prince of Wales was desperate for a daughter and upon hearing his second child’s gender, he said, “Oh God, it’s a boy,” and then continued, “And he’s even got red hair!”

Their royal marriage didn’t last long after Prince Harry wasborn. The couple formally divorced in 1996, about 1 year before her tragicdeath.

Source: Read Full Article

How Old Was Al Pacino in 'Scarface': Who Should Lead the Reboot?

The news is out: Scarface is getting the reboot treatment, and Luca Gaudagnino is set to direct the upcoming movie for Universal Studios. Considering reboots are all the rage — and this is one the greatest crime classics of all time — it was inevitable that such a movie would make its way into the reboot realm. Unfortunately, Al Pacino has aged out of the role a bit.

Who could forget Al Pacino’s memorable Golden Globe-nominated turn as Tony Montana? Al Pacino was filming Scarface when he was in his early 40s, as the movie premiered in 1983, and Pacino was born in 1940. Thus, when the movie came out, Pacino was already 43 despite the fact that the character was supposed to be in his mid-30s. Yet, this is Hollywood, and Al Pacino was the right pick, even if he was about a decade older than Montana. Yet, with news of a reboot on the horizon, who should take on the coveted role?

A while back, when news surrounding a Scarface remake began to surface, Diego Luna was attached to the lead character. Luna is well known for his roles in Rogue One: A Star Wars story, Flatliners, and more. However, he confirmed back in February that he is longer connected to the role, as Collider noted. So, who should step up to the plate? Who has what it takes to fill Al Pacino’s very large shoes? 

RELATED: Has Al Pacino Ever Won an Oscar? ‘The Irishman’ Star Has Been Nominated 9 Times

1. What about Bobby Cannavale? 

Bobby Canavale may be fifty years old, but he doesn’t look a day over 40, so age can be dismissed when it comes to this one.  Though Bobby Cannavale may be recognized for his more comedic roles — Spy, The Other Guys, Jumanji, and more — his work in Vinyl, The Irishman, and Danny Collins shows that he has the range necessary to take on a dramatic and an intense role. 

RELATED: How Many Movies Have Robert DeNiro and Al Pacino Made Together?

Scarface 2.0 could be Cannavale’s ticket out of great supporting roles — which he has always risen to — and into the spotlight of an Oscar-worthy narrative. Cannavale has also worked with Pacino in the past, so maybe he could call him up and ask for a few tips.

2. Oscar Isaac could convincingly carry ‘Scarface’

If anyone has mastered looks that can kill, it’s Oscar Isaac. Oscar Isaac is quite adept in the action and drama spaces, previously appearing in Ex Machina, Triple Frontier, Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker, and more. He’s also 41 years old, which makes him about the same age Al Pacino was when he rose to the challenge.

3. Pedro Pascal is currently all the rage  

Due to The Mandalorian, everyone knows who Pedro Pascal is, and if the filmmakers are looking to cast an actor whose name will draw people to the theatre, he would be a wise pick.

From Graceland and Narcos to Game of Thrones, Pascal has a portfolio that has virtually led to this career moment. Pascal has a certain presence about him — he brings an intensity and a fierce conviction to each role, which would work for Tony Montana. 

Source: Read Full Article

Life on the ocean wave was a floating HELL!

Life on the ocean wave was a floating HELL! Limbs left shattered by accidents. Disease and malnutrition rife. Death stalking the decks. No wonder the wretches press-ganged to join the Navy became ‘stupefied savages’

  • Stephen Taylor examines the ‘heroic age of sail’ in a fascinating new tome
  • Author details how more sailors died from fevers and accidents than in war
  • He claims Britain’s era of Imperial glory was down to the might of the Royal Navy

BOOK OF THE WEEK

SONS OF THE WAVES   

by Stephen Taylor (Yale £20, 416 pp)

Apart from a brief cameo appearance by Admiral Nelson (‘a leader of unique qualities’), officers and gentlemen do not feature in Stephen Taylor’s engrossing study of the ‘heroic age of sail’.

His concern is not with policy-makers and strategists, but the ordinary and anonymous mass of sailors — 128,930 of them by the year 1800, 48 per cent of whom were enduring a life on the ocean wave thanks to the press gangs.

Forcible recruitment — or ‘impressment’ — was the forerunner of compulsory conscription, and had official backing.

Stephen Taylor reflects on the ‘heroic age of sail’ in a fascinating new tome. Pictured: Sailors going wild in port

‘Knife-grinders and street-singers, bird-dealers and shoemakers, hawkers of prints and sellers of herring’, all could find themselves bundled off aboard one of His Majesty’s ships.

Ragamuffins, or ‘distressed orphans’, were also scooped up by the authorities to become cabin boys or ‘powder monkeys’, carrying ammunition from the hold to the ship’s artillery.

In truth, some men grew to prefer a sailor’s life to one of poverty in the cities. ‘I was young, did not fret much, and was willing to go to any part of the world,’ said one of Taylor’s witnesses — the author has examined ships’ logs, Admiralty records and court-martial proceedings.

There was always the hope that a person might venture to ‘lands of outlandish peoples and mystifying customs’ and return home bearing fabulous tales of, for example, alligators, ‘the shape of a newt but large and voracious, so as to kill and eat a man in a very short time’.

Mostly, however, for the sailors toiling below decks or up in the rigging, their existence was a ‘hellish floating torment’.

Every hour of the day the masts needed maintaining, the sails required mending, the decks had to be scrubbed. The men adjusted the canvas, ‘often in peril or great haste, to suit challenging conditions’.

The sails had to be hauled in when the wind became excessive, and often they were shredded to pieces. The masts would vibrate and bend like the boughs of a tree. There were no safety harnesses. Sailors manoeuvred themselves courageously along swaying footropes.

Fatalities were frequent, men plummeting to their doom. The dead were sewn into a hammock and flung overboard. ‘As a precautionary measure, to ensure he was really dead, a final stitch was passed through the nose.’ If battle commenced against the Spanish, Dutch or French, ‘all was thunder and smoke’, and the shot and splinters cut people into a pulp. The decks, we are told, would be awash with ‘carcasses, entrails and dismembered limbs’.

Stephen said in the absence of food, sailors would eat grass, drink their own urine and attempt to cannibalize the bodies of dead shipmates. Pictured: A Royal Navy 28 gun frigate

More sailors died from fevers and accidents, however, than in war. Living conditions were cramped and insanitary, the men’s quarters ‘atrocious, damp, stinking with disease and bodily effusions’.

Malnutrition was rife. For months at sea, the diet was oatmeal porridge, salted meat and biscuits, unrelieved by fresh produce. Hence, before the discovery of the vitamin properties of citrus fruit, the epidemic of scurvy, where ‘people’s minds became as loose and unsteady as their teeth’.

Discipline wasn’t only strict, it was tyrannical. Captains, a law unto the themselves, ordered frequent floggings. Aboard one ship in 1797, during a voyage to the West Indies lasting 38 weeks, 1,392 lashes were handed out to a crew of 160. No wonder there were mutinies, though no one on The Bounty resembled Marlon Brando. The aggrieved sailors were ‘unkempt, snaggle-toothed and bow-legged,’ says Taylor. Nor did any Englishman find paradise if they deserted or were shipwrecked in the South Seas. ‘In the absence of food, they ate grass, drank their own urine and attempted cannibalising the bodies of dead shipmates.’

However, as Taylor says, the ‘wealth, strength, security and glory of Britain’ during our era of Imperial glory was down to the might of the Royal Navy.

Stephen claims ‘fornication went on relatively discreetly’ behind the cannon, when a woman came on board. Pictured: Marlon Brando as Fletcher Christian in Mutiny on the Bounty

It’s a wonder the enterprise ever came together, as the actual men, the humble ratings, were treated like slaves. The rate of pay of £12 per annum established in 1653 did not change for 150 years, a grievance sparking the mutinies in 1797 at Spithead and Nore. Agitators were quickly jailed, flogged and hanged from the yardarm.

The only solace was alcohol. Drunkenness was encouraged by generous rations: a gallon of beer, a pint of wine, or half a pint of rum a day. It was as if they were encouraged to become stupefied savages.

They always went wild in port. A sailor would ‘eat, drink, cavort and fornicate like a lord’. When women came on board, ‘fornication went on relatively discreetly’ behind the cannon. (Nelson’s Lady Hamilton is described as ‘an overweight, blowsy seductress, full of animal magnetism and an armoury of attention-seeking skills’, more Hattie Jacques than Vivien Leigh.)

Sailors, said Daniel Defoe, ‘swear violently, whore violently, drink punch violently’. If they were to be feared, ‘celebrating, fighting or dying in the streets of London, all too often knife in hand’, it may have been because the Navy’s origins in Tudor days lay in lawless buccaneering and piracy.

SONS OF THE WAVES by Stephen Taylor (Yale £20, 416 pp) 

Francis Drake, searching for trunks of gold and pieces-of-eight, had with Queen Elizabeth’s blessing been ‘setting sail for distant profit’. His successors’ official task, in the late 17th and early 18th century, was ‘to annoy and distress the Spaniards by taking, sinking, burning or otherwise destroying all their ships’.

Until the slave trade was abolished in 1807, it was one of the fleet’s most lucrative operations. There was sugar to be shipped from the Caribbean to Liverpool and Bristol, convicts to transport to Australia, exports to be traded from India, where British sailors found the curries ‘very disagreeable to uninitiated palates’.

The contrast between the splendour of the actual oak ships, ‘the great cathedrals of 74 guns and more’, and the fate of the shabby crews manning them, was to remain marked.

When sailors were discharged or invalided out, there was little provision. Veterans would congregate at Greenwich, hoping for alms: ‘mutilated creatures, some clean and decently apparelled, some dirty and almost naked. Some have lost an eye; some have a hand, some an arm off; some with wooden legs.’ Many were reduced by starvation to begging.

This account of ‘the heroic age of sail’, which ends before the switch from sail to steam at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, is suffused with ‘a dark Dickensian melancholy’. Instead of reform, there was the coldness of charity.

The Destitute Sailors’ Asylum was founded in 1827, two decades after the death of Nelson at Trafalgar. Disability pay came in four years later.

The ‘sons of the waves’, who gave their all for British prosperity and expansion, might receive up to two shillings a day — that’s about £7 in today’s money.

Source: Read Full Article

Coronavirus' severity was hidden by the Chinese: Pompeo

Pompeo: China’s authoritarian regime hid coronavirus’ severity

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo says the United States knows enough at this point to be confident exactly where coronavirus originated and goes on to say that allowing the WHO to fail again is ‘unacceptable.’

Get all the latest news on coronavirus and more delivered daily to your inbox. Sign up here.

Continue Reading Below

As the coronavirus has surpassed 3.7 million cases worldwide, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is imploring the Chinese government to provide more information on how the pandemic originated. There is growing speculation from the Trump administration that the virus could have been created in a lab in Wuhan, a theory that the intelligence community has disputed.

"We still continue to implore the Chinese government to turn over the samples, to allow Westerners in to look at those labs," Pompeo told "Lou Dobbs Tonight" on Wednesday. "We still need information not only to work on this particular crisis but to do everything we can to take down the risk that something like this can happen again."

US PROBES UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS LINKS TO CHINESE LAB SCRUTINIZED OVER CORONAVIRUS

Pompeo said the spread of the coronavirus could’ve been prevented if the Chinese government acted faster.

"We know that the Chinese knew about this at least by December and didn’t act fast enough and the World Health Organization at the behest of the Chinese failed to declare this a pandemic in a timely fashion," Pompeo said. "These are the kind of things that caused this problem."

Pompeo believes the Chinese government has an obligation to be transparent with the rest of the world but has made every effort to hide to the coronavirus's severity, costing thousands of lives.

"We saw what they did to the journalists that they kicked out, American journalists they kicked out, and we saw what they did to some of the doctors who, early on, raising the flag and said, 'hey, we've got a problem,' " Pompeo said. "We've seen this kind of behavior, this kind of activity…they hide, they dissemble. They then propagate disinformation, propaganda that we saw when they tried to pin it on the United States."

While China claims it wants to be transparent, Pompeo said the nation's actions suggest the exact opposite.

"To be a reliable partner, you have to be transparent and they have done exactly the opposite here," Pompeo said. "They’ve done what authoritarian regimes do and that’s not only cost loss of life so far but continues to be a danger and threat to the American people."

US PORK EXPORTS TO CHINA SKYROCKETED BEFORE FEARS OF MEAT SHORTAGE

The WHO’s top emergencies expert, Dr. Mike Ryan, disputed Pompeo’s claims in an online press conference earlier this week saying, "We have not received any data-specific evidence from the U.S. government relating to the purported origin of the virus. So from our perspective, this remains speculative.”

Ryan added that "if that data and evidence is available, then it will be for the United States government to decide whether and when it can be shared.”

China's foreign ministry spokesman, Zhao Lijian said there is "no scientific basis" to back up Pompeo's claim that the virus originated in its labs in Wuhan, according to the Associated Press.

"We always believe that this is a scientific issue and requires the professional assessment of scientists and medical experts," Lijian said during a briefing on April 16.

China also has strongly denied allegations that it delayed announcing the virus outbreak in Wuhan and that it has underreported case numbers.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

As for the World Health Organization, Pompeo said it is unacceptable to continue to "put hundreds of millions of American dollars to the World Health Organization if it’s not going to deliver."

As a result, the Trump administration is working to create its own agency to deal with international health operations to prevent what it sees as the WHO from failing the world again.

"We know how to run international health operations and we’re determined to find a good way so that we can be, as we have always been, the leader in global health policy that’s saved lives all across the world," Pompeo said. "The WHO. simply didn't accomplish what its intended mission was, and as the president says about organizations that are multilateral in nature, if they work, fine. If they don't, we're simply not going to be part of it."

President Trump announced last month that the United States will halt funding for the WHO, accusing the organization of being "China-centric."

According to the latest update by Johns Hopkins University, there are more than 1.2 million confirmed coronavirus cases in the United States and more than 73,000 deaths.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Source: Read Full Article

Was Tupac Shakur Single When He Died?

Tupac Shakur is an iconic artist and is considered by many people to be one of the greatest rappers that ever lived.

The level of his artistry was impossible to deny even during his lifetime, and he received critical acclaim for his work in music as well as for his acting projects. Shakur’s tragic death in 1996 has remained the subject of intense speculation to this day, and fans still relish learning everything that they can about the game-changing rapper.

Shakur’s romances have become legendary as well — although many Shakur super fans might be surprised to learn whom he was dating the year that he passed away. 

How did Tupac Shakur become famous?

Tupac Shakur was born in New York City in 1971. Shakur got involved with art at an early age and even attended art school for a time. He befriended up and coming actress Jada Pinkett (now known as Jada Pinkett Smith) and the two remained friends until Shakur’s death.

In the late ’80s, Shakur began exploring his musical abilities and in 1991, Shakur released his debut album, 2Pacalypse Now. 

Shakur’s music was controversial from the beginning, featuring themes of police brutality, oppression, unjust social policies in government, and discrimination against African-Americans.

Shakur’s second album, which he released in 1993, was an even bigger hit than the first and made Shakur a bonafide superstar. Shakur was consistently the subject of controversy throughout his career, beyond the music that he released. In 1995, Shakur served a sentence for sexual assault.

However, his time in jail did little to quell his incredible popularity, and his fans never stopped supporting his right to speak out about causes that mattered to him.

Who did Tupac Shakur date?

Tupac Shakur’s personal life was often in the headlines. One of his earliest known relationships was with the superstar Madonna. The two dated in 1993 for nearly a year, although they kept their romance intensely private.

In fact, Madonna didn’t speak out about their relationship until years after Shakur was killed, admitting that the rapper was hesitant to be linked to her when they were dating due to the effect that it could have had on his image.

In 1994, Shakur began dating Keisha Morris. The two got married in April 1995, during the time that Shakur was incarcerated. Their romance proved to be short and sweet, and they split up only five months after Shakur was released from prison.

Following his split from Morris, Shakur was rumored to have dated a few different women, from Whitney Houston to model Heather Hunter. 

Was Tupac Shakur dating anyone when he died?

Tupac Shakur would have undoubtedly gone on to do incredible things with his life. In the short time that he was active in entertainment, the rapper and actor made an impression that reverberates to this day.

Sadly, his light was snuffed out all too soon when, in September 1996, Shakur was shot and killed in a Las Vegas drive-by shooting. The details of his death remain scarce, and his killer has never been identified. 

Shakur left behind thousands of grieving fans, as well as a fiancé. Shakur and Kidada Jones, the daughter of Quincy Jones and Peggy Lipton, started dating in early 1996 and just a few months prior to Shakur’s untimely death, the two had gotten engaged.

Jones was reportedly the person to last speak to Shakur in the hospital before he succumbed to death, and even today, she claims that the rapper was the “love of her life.” 

Although his death will always remain suspicious, Tupac Shakur left an indelible impression on pop culture. Stay tuned to Showbiz Cheat Sheet for all the latest entertainment news!

Source: Read Full Article

Couple whose wedding was cancelled get married in their garden

Couple whose wedding was cancelled due to coronavirus get married in their garden with their dogs as bridesmaids and live-stream it on Facebook for friends and family to watch

  • Autumn Wood, 28, and Christian Miller, 28, from Ohio, married in back garden
  • Autumn’s brother-in-law, who is isolating with them, officiated their ceremony 
  • Couple streamed ceremony to their friends and family through Facebook Live 
  • Here’s how to help people impacted by Covid-19

A couple whose wedding was cancelled due to coronavirus ‘got married’ in their back garden while their guests watched on Facebook Live. 

Autumn Wood, 28, and Christian Miller, 28, from Cincinnati, Ohio, were unable to go ahead with the wedding they had planned because of lockdown – and so came up with another way to tie the knot. 

Their ceremony was officiated by Autumn’s brother-in-law, who they are isolating with, and saw them don face masks and have dogs Sasha and Oreo as stand in bridesmaids. 

Just Autumn’s mother Cindi, Christian’s parents Tom and Barb and Christian’s brother Ben were present as the sweet couple got married on April 20 – the anniversary of the day they met.  

Autumn Wood, 28, and Christian Miller, 28, (pictured)  from Cincinnati, Ohio, were unable to go ahead with the wedding they had planned because of lockdown and so got married in their back garden

Their ceremony was officiated by Autumn’s brother-in-law, who they are isolating with, and saw them don face masks and have dogs Sasha and Oreo as stand in bridesmaids 

The couple were able to transform their back garden with decorations they had already purchased for their original wedding day – which they have rescheduled until after lockdown. 

Newlywed Autumn, an IT supervisor, said: ‘I had already gathered a lot of decorations and with our anniversary coming up, we just didn’t want to wait to be married any longer.

‘Christian, his parents and I spent the day transforming the backyard with things we had planned to use in May and we sent out a notice on Facebook for our families to join the live-stream so they could watch our ceremony.

‘Our dogs Sasha and Oreo were my stand in bridesmaids and, although they were very good and didn’t bark at all, they totally stole the show!

‘My new brother-in-law Ben married us and then cooked us all an incredible steak dinner followed by a delicious carrot cheesecake made by my mother-in-law Barb.

Autumn told how the ceremony was a ‘welcome break’ from the pandemic, and insisted that she’ll ‘cherish’ the memory of their big day forever

The pair stood beneath a beautifully decorated wooden arch on their porch, as they shared their nuptials with decorations planned for their original wedding 

‘Afterwards, we sat by the fire and listened to our wedding playlist for the rest of the night.

‘It was perfect – it wasn’t what I planned and it didn’t go the way I had been planning for months but I wouldn’t trade it.

‘I felt beautiful, it was all about me and the love of my life and I think looking back it’s going to be a wonderful story and moment for us.’ 

She told how the ceremony was a ‘welcome break’ from the pandemic, and insisted that she’ll ‘cherish’ the memory of their big day forever.  

Just Autumn’s mum Cindi, Christian’s parents Tom and Barb and Christian’s brother Ben were present as the sweet couple got married on April 20 – and the ceremony was officiated by Autumn’s brother-in-law 

Newlywed Autumn, an IT supervisor, said: ‘I had already gathered a lot of decorations and with our anniversary coming up, we just didn’t want to wait to be married any longer’ 

‘I think our friends and family needed a break from the chaos and for a moment, we gave them that peace. I’ll cherish that forever.’

After months of planning the perfect day, the engaged pair were devastated when lockdown caused their wedding on on May 23 to be cancelled. 

But unwilling to let the virus ruin their big day, the pair stood beneath a beautifully decorated wooden arch on their porch decorated with fairy lights, as they made their vows. 

The couple have also rescheduled their honeymoon to Disneyland, planned for August.

Source: Read Full Article

Was my baby girl struck by children's coronavirus?

Was my baby girl struck by children’s coronavirus? KATE MANSEY thought her daughter was dead when she passed out… only for her to recover but develop a temperature and cough

  • Here’s how to help people impacted by Covid-19

They were 30 seconds of my life that must have aged me about ten years. My toddler had tried to climb the stairs and as she tumbled down the last couple of steps on her bottom, there was a thud and a cry. A normal part of learning to get about for a child of 20 months.

I picked her up and dried her tears, but then the most unimaginable and unexpected thing happened: as Ivy tried to draw breath for her next wail, she passed out cold. Her head lolled back and she went floppy in my arms.

I called her name, tried in vain to get her to respond and shouted for help. I can still hear the blood-curdling, pit-of-the-stomach sound of a woman screaming ‘My baby! My baby!’ which it later occurred to me must have been my own voice.

I ran up the stairs cradling her and locked eyes with my husband – I’ve never seen him look so scared. We both thought our beautiful daughter must be dead.

Yet within moments she had come back around and was hugging my husband’s neck, panting – an Easter Monday miracle.

We rushed her to the A&E at King’s College Hospital, by which time I was sobbing uncontrollably with sheer relief that she would now get medical attention.

I must have seemed deranged because by now, my little girl was toddling up to the nurses to show them her dolly, her temperature was fine and the consultant said perhaps it was just one of those things that happens to infants from time to time.

They gave us lunch, kept us for three hours of observation and sent us home.

It was only the next day when Ivy developed a temperature and a cough that I wished I had asked them to test her for Covid-19.

For weeks beforehand my son, too, had been experiencing symptoms of the virus that I wouldn’t describe as ‘mild’. And when, last week, NHS leaders issued an urgent nationwide alert to doctors, warning of a more severe ‘coronavirus-related syndrome’ in children, I began to wonder: could this have been it?

I know that other families have seen their children go down with unexpected and sometimes frightening symptoms in the past few weeks before bouncing back. Are children more seriously at risk than we have – so far – been told?

The alert about the new syndrome came from doctors in London and elsewhere in the UK who had noticed a sudden spike in children admitted to intensive care with rashes, convulsions, cardiac inflammation and stomach pain.

The suggestion is that in very rare cases, Covid-19 might cause a child’s immune system to overreact as it battles to fight off the virus. This can lead to a general inflammation of blood vessels similar to Kawasaki disease, a rare condition that usually affects under-fives. It can cause damage to internal organs.

Given what we’d experienced, I began to investigate. At first, the statistics were encouraging. Children seemed largely untouched by the virus. Save for some tragic cases – last month a five-year-old became the UK’s youngest victim – the NHS guidance shows that children, if they do get coronavirus, seem to experience very mild symptoms.

The chances that Ivy had been in danger seemed small.

Children have so far accounted for only between one per cent and five per cent of diagnosed Covid-19 cases worldwide. Mostly they show milder signs of the disease, and deaths among the under-tens are rare. Great Ormond Street experts say about half of children have a fever, 40 per cent have a cough and fewer than ten per cent have gastrointestinal symptoms.

But then came last week’s news that children could not only catch the virus, but that in some rare cases, the consequences are severe. For these children, the immune system, which remains immature right up to adolescence, can become its own worst enemy.

Professor Russell Viner, president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH), told me that UK medics were the first to spot the alarming – yet rare – phenomenon and have since discussed their findings with Italian and Spanish doctors who realise with hindsight that they, too, have seen such cases.

‘We’ve seen this in adults, too, though not this exact phenomenon,’ said Prof Viner. ‘The link to Covid-19 isn’t yet proven but we think it’s very likely. However, it’s important to realise that this is not a new mutation of the bug or something we’re worried is going to escalate. It’s an incredibly rare subset, and we know how to treat it.’

He added: ‘These findings are testimony to the way our doctors and researchers work together. It’s just what we’re good at.’

There have been 20 cases in the UK, according to the RCPCH, but with no one sign or symptom.

Dr Mike Linney, paediatrician and registrar at the RCPCH, said: ‘All of these children were extremely unwell, with features suggestive of sepsis such as a persistently high temperature coupled with rapid breathing, cold hands and feet and sleepiness.

‘The other symptoms varied greatly in the different cases.’

It all rings a worrying bell for me. Not long before my daughter’s fainting spell, my five-year-old son suddenly fell ill. Ted woke in the night saying he was ‘not vewwy well’. He had started coughing the day before so, with coronavirus on my mind, I checked his temperature. It was normal, so I wondered whether he was just having a bad dream. Unusually clingy, he grabbed my arm and said: ‘Mummy, don’t leave me.’

Within 20 minutes his temperature rocketed to 40C and his little body (why do children always seem to look so much smaller when they’re poorly?) was shaking violently. He was still clinging on to me as I mouthed over his shoulder to my husband: ‘Oh God, this must be “it”.’

Ted vomited several times – the bathroom, his room, our room. Yet within 24 hours he seemed almost back to his usual self. Almost. But here’s the strangest thing: nearly two weeks later, he still wasn’t well and spiralled down again. This time, his fever lasted seven days and nights and his cough had returned with a vengeance.

He complained of a sharp, persistent pain in his armpit and one in his tummy. He had diarrhoea, barely ate and would fall asleep sitting up in chairs. His breathing was laboured and I would go into his room every hour through the night to check on him.

I made a couple of frantic calls to the GP surgery and had a phone call with a doctor and then, a few days later, a video call with another. Was I missing something? Tonsillitis? Appendicitis? Something that could be treated, I hoped.

Their view was that this was coronavirus, and they said that if his breathing got worse I should call back or, if I was really worried, go to hospital.

The boomerang nature of it shocked me but after a week of being so ill – far worse than last year’s chicken pox or his infant case of hand, foot and mouth disease – the colour gradually returned to his cheeks.

Then, within days of the children being ill, I had the cough, too. There followed a week in bed for me with chest pains and a terrifying sensation that felt like drowning despite being on dry land.

Did we all have coronavirus? None of us was tested, but I’d put money on it.

Certainly, we need to know more about how this virus affects children and, in order for us to successfully emerge from lockdown, how they transmit it.

My two are now completely better, thank goodness. But the biggest worry is that other parents will be lulled into a false sense of security and believe, like I did, that coronavirus is not a big deal for children. The fear is that some won’t seek help when it is needed.

As any good doctor will tell you, parents know their child best. You know what ‘a bit under the weather’ looks like and that it’s a world away from ‘desperately poorly’.

We must remember, too, that there are doctors there to help. As the dedicated team at King’s College Hospital said to me: ‘We’re open for business as usual.’ 

Source: Read Full Article